WINOGRAD v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP


11 A.D.3d 455 (2004)

782 N.Y.S.2d 753

MICHELE WINOGRAD et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., et al., Respondents. TONY AVERSA, Doing Business as AVERSA LANDSCAPING AND MASONRY, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 4, 2004.


Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered March 29, 2004, as denied the branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered October 15, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered March 29, 2004, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases