1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 355 F.3d
  5. 355 F.3d 92 (2004)
 

P. STOLZ FAMILY PARTNERSHIP L.P. v. DAUM

Docket No. 02-7680.

355 F.3d 92 (2004)

P. STOLZ FAMILY PARTNERSHIP L.P., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Steven B. DAUM, Paula B. Daum, Philip Spies, and Smart World Technologies, LLC, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: January 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Wexler, Bragar Wexler Eagel & Morgenstern, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

Barry S. Pollack, Donnelly Controy & Gelhaar, LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Giovanni Prezioso, General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, Allan A. Capute, Special Counsel to the Solicitor, for Amicus Curiae S.E.C., Washington, D.C.

Before: CALABRESI, SACK, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Judge CALABRESI concurs in a separate opinion.

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Smart World Technologies (Smart World) was one of many technology companies that did not survive the bursting of the technology bubble during 2000. Its business was free Internet access. At some point during its existence, Smart World began offering and selling "membership interests" in the company through a written prospectus. The P. Stolz Family Partnership (Stolz) purchased 31,250 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases