1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 9 A.D.3d
  5. 9 A.D.3d 434 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. DUNLAP

9 A.D.3d 434 (2004)

780 N.Y.S.2d 171

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAHEEM DUNLAP, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 19, 2004.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In determining whether a photographic array was "unduly suggestive" the hearing court should consider whether there was any substantial likelihood that the defendant would be singled out for identification (see People v Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 336 [1990], cert denied 498 U.S. 833 [1990]; People v Galletti, 239 A.D.2d 598 [1997]). Two separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases