1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 11 A.D.3d
  5. 11 A.D.3d 430 (2004)
 

HENRY v. ADVANCE PROCESS SUPPLY COMPANY

11 A.D.3d 430 (2004)

782 N.Y.S.2d 769

RACHEL J. HENRY et al., Appellants, v. ADVANCE PROCESS SUPPLY COMPANY et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 4, 2004.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In its order dated May 28, 2003, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant Advance Process Supply Company had complied with a conditional order of preclusion dated April 8, 2003 (see Bach v City of New York, 304 A.D.2d 686 [2003]; Vasile v Chisena, 272 A.D.2d 610 [2000]). The plaintiffs did not advance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases