OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
In the course of his resignation, the respondent submits that he was served with a petition on or about April 2, 2003, charging him with professional misconduct based upon his conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree. In addition, the respondent brought to the petitioner's attention information pertaining to a complaint received from the law firm of Agovino and Asselta, LLP. The respondent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.