Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.
The Supreme Court properly treated the defendant's motion as one for leave to reargue because it was not based upon new facts that were unavailable at the time of the original motion (see CPLR 2221 [d]; Nam Jin Chung v M & S Deli,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.