DANZIGER v. LUSE

No. 2002-1880.

103 Ohio St.3d 337 (2004)

2004-Ohio-5227

DANZIGER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LUSE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 13, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jared E. Danziger, Nathan G. Danziger and Samuel R. Danziger, pro se.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Thomas B. Ridgley and John C. Vorys, for appellee.


PFEIFER, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether appellants have a right to inspect the records of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company in which they own stock. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that they do.

{¶ 2} Appellants Jared, Nathan, and Samuel Danziger own stock in Croghan Bancshares, Inc. ("the company"), which has one operating asset, Crogan-Colonial Bank ("the bank"). The bank has only one stockholder, the company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases