DECICCO v. STAEHLE


11 A.D.3d 425 (2004)

783 N.Y.S.2d 380

DONNA DECICCO, Respondent, v. STEPHEN V. STAEHLE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 4, 2004.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant seller's contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff buyer's motion for summary judgment on her cause of action for specific performance. The contract provided for a closing to take place on or before September 10, 2001, but did not make time of the essence (see Savitsky v Sukenik, 240 A.D.2d 557 [1997]). Thus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases