The record reveals that neither 34th Street Partnership nor the additional-party defendants, who were engaged in installing and removing signage in the business district pursuant to various contractual arrangements, created the condition that caused plaintiff's trip and fall. Nor did any of these parties comprehensively assume the duties of the landowner pursuant to their various agreements. Under the circumstances, none of the moving defendants owed a duty to plaintiff ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.