Plaintiff's claim for fraud was not pleaded with the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016 [b]), and his claims for civil rights violations were devoid of supporting factual allegations. His remaining claim, for breach of contract, was not viable in light of the admissions contained in his pleading and the terms of the subject car loan agreement, which together establish conclusively that plaintiff was in default under the agreement and that defendant bank was entitled...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
