Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated September 5, 2003, as denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was for a change of custody and granted the plaintiff's cross motion to the extent of allowing her to contact the child by telephone only once per week is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as those portions of the order were superseded by the order dated September 12, 2003; and it is further,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.