VIGIL v. FRANKLIN

No. 03SC479.

103 P.3d 322 (2004)

James P. VIGIL, as Conservator for James R. Vigil, Petitioner, v. William FRANKLIN, Gladys Franklin, and Will Franklin, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

November 30, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Buchanan, Jurdem & Cederberg, P.C., Ross B.H. Buchanan, Denver, for Petitioner.

Levy, Morse & Wheeler, P.C., Karen H. Wheeler, Brian J. Waters, Englewood, for Respondents.

Holland & Hart, Susannah Pollvogt, Patricia Dean, Denver, Amicus Curiae for Colorado Trial Lawyers Association.

Campbell, Latiolais & Ruebel, P.C., Jeffrey Clay Ruebel, Denver, Amicus Curiae for Colorado Defense Lawyer's Association.

Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Lee Mickus, Denver, Amicus Curiae for Colorado Civil Justice League.


RICE, Justice.

Petitioner James Vigil seeks review of the court of appeals' decision that the trial court's grant of summary judgment was proper because the common law open and obvious danger doctrine survived enactment of Colorado's premises liability statute.1 We reverse.

Upon review, we find that the express, unambiguous language of the statute evidences the General Assembly's intent to establish a comprehensive and exclusive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases