1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 360 F.Supp.2d
  5. 360 F.Supp.2d 60 (2004)
 

HICKEY v. WASHINGTON METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTH.

No. 00-1712 (RJL).

360 F.Supp.2d 60 (2004)

Robert J. HICKEY, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Hickey, Bethesda, MD, pro se.

Jay Richard Goldman, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEON, District Judge.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA" and "defendant"), contends that the plaintiff, Robert J. Hickey ("Hickey" and "plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, is unable to establish that WMATA had actual or constructive notice of the wet floor that the plaintiff alleges caused him to slip, fall, and injure himself. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases