ROMAN v. PARKASH


4 A.D.3d 408 (2004)

771 N.Y.S.2d 369

LEDA ROMAN, Appellant, v. VED PARKASH, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 9, 2004.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's contention that the Supreme Court should have charged the jury with certain provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (hereinafter the Building Code) which were in effect in 1938, is unpreserved for appellate review (see Frumusa v Weyer Constr., 245 A.D.2d 416, 417 [1997]; Saleh v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 119 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases