1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 7 A.D.3d
  5. 7 A.D.3d 398 (2004)
 

V.C. VITANZA SONS, INC. v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

7 A.D.3d 398 (2004)

776 N.Y.S.2d 472

V.C. VITANZA SONS, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 18, 2004.

In interpreting a contract, the plain meaning of words and phrases should be determined and the language construed so as to give full meaning and effect to all provisions of the agreement (American Express Bank v Uniroyal, Inc., 164 A.D.2d 275, 277 [1990], lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 807 [1991]). Here, the plain and unambiguous language of the agreements established that the parties intended a flat fee would be paid for monthly inspections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases