1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 7 A.D.3d
  5. 7 A.D.3d 396 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. CHARLEMAGNE

7 A.D.3d 396 (2004)

776 N.Y.S.2d 470

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRED CHARLEMAGNE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 18, 2004.

Since defendant did not request any further relief after his objections were sustained, his challenge to the prosecutor's summation remark concerning defendant's right to a trial is unpreserved (People v Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951 [1981]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that although the prosecutor's remarks could be viewed as improperly denigrating defendant's exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases