The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing reasonable limits on defendant's cross-examination of a police witness. Defendant received a full opportunity to inquire into all matters relevant to the officer's credibility, including the officer's allegedly improper discharge of his weapon and the ensuing police investigation. The precluded questions were irrelevant, improper in form, or likely to mislead the jury. To the extent that defendant is raising a constitutional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
