1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 5 A.D.3d
  5. 5 A.D.3d 397 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. HALLUMS

5 A.D.3d 397 (2004)

771 N.Y.S.2d 903

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAYQUAN HALLUMS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 1, 2004.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

To the extent that the defendant argues on appeal that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict because the testimony of prosecution witnesses was incredible as a matter of law or because an accomplice's testimony was not sufficiently corroborated, his contentions are not preserved for appellate review (see People v Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases