While there may have been sufficient evidence to support the redetermination that respondent was not in sympathy with the principles of the Democratic Party, that determination was tainted by the ex parte communication between Howard Vargas and the hearing officer, the Chairman of the Bronx County Democratic Committee, and Vargas's involvement in crafting the Committee Chairman's redetermination (see Matter of LePore v McCall,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF RIVERA v. ESPADA, JR.
3 A.D.3d 398 (2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 25
In the Matter of PETER M. RIVERA et al., Appellants, v. PEDRO ESPADA, JR, Respondent, et al., Respondents, and THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BY JOSEPH BRUNO, AS SENATOR, Intervenor-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 20, 2004.
January 20, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
