1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 6 A.D.3d
  5. 6 A.D.3d 393 (2004)
 

KERMAN v. FRIEDMAN

6 A.D.3d 393 (2004)

773 N.Y.S.2d 899

NEIL KERMAN, Respondent, v. MARTIN FRIEDMAN, C.P.A., P.C., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 5, 2004.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion was properly denominated as one for leave to reargue, even though the Supreme Court stated that the "motion should have been denominated as [one] to renew" (Jandru Mats v Riteway AV Corp., 1 A.D.3d 565 [2003]; see EMC Mtge. Corp. v Stewart, 2 A.D.3d 772 [2003]; Matter of Orange &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases