1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 4 A.D.3d
  5. 4 A.D.3d 395 (2004)
 

HARRIOTT v. PENDER

4 A.D.3d 395 (2004)

772 N.Y.S.2d 341

CISLYN O. HARRIOTT et al., Respondents, v. DAVID PENDER et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 9, 2004.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from by the defendant David Pender, on the law, the motion by the defendant David Pender is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against that defendant, and the action against the defendant Iran Rowe is severed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Iran Rowe; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases