The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. Contrary to appellant's contention that he was merely present at the scene when his companions robbed the victims, there was ample evidence warranting the inference of accessorial liability, including evidence that appellant encouraged his companions to hit the victims, and that he...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
