MIGDAL, POLLACK v. COLEMAN


6 Misc.3d 378 (2004)

789 N.Y.S.2d 656

MIGDAL, POLLACK & ROSENKRANTZ LLP, Plaintiff, v. JOHN COLEMAN, Also Known as JOHN BENNETT COLEMAN, Defendant.

Supreme Court, New York County.

October 29, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence A. Beckenstein, New York City, for defendant.

Strassberg & Strassberg, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff.


OPINION OF THE COURT

EDWARD H. LEHNER, J.

The key issue presented on this motion by defendant for summary judgment is whether the arbitration requirements for attorney-client matrimonial fee disputes set forth in part 136 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (the Rules; 22 NYCRR part 100 et seq.) apply when the total fee charged for services rendered in a domestic relations matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases