1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 11 A.D.3d
  5. 11 A.D.3d 373 (2004)
 

JIANG v. TAN

11 A.D.3d 373 (2004)

783 N.Y.S.2d 557

RONG RONG JIANG et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL TAN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 21, 2004.

As to the breach of contract claim, the contract and bill of sale for the restaurant specifically called for a sales price of $150,000 that could not be changed orally. The parol evidence rule bars admission of any prior or contemporaneous oral agreement that may vary or add to the terms of a fully integrated, written agreement (SAA-A v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 281 A.D.2d 201, 203 [2001]). Such evidence may not be used...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases