Since the verdict convicting defendant of assault in the first degree and acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was not repugnant, the court properly denied defendant's request to resubmit the case to the jury and accepted the verdict. A verdict is repugnant "only when it is inherently inconsistent when viewed in light of the elements of each crime as charged to the jury" (People v Tucker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SACKES
11 A.D.3d 364 (2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 369
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARTHUR SACKES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 21, 2004.
October 21, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
