The court should have required a showing by the People that safety concerns warranted maintaining the undercover officers' anonymity before it directed that these officers be identified only by their shield numbers during their testimony (see People v Mulligan,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.