1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 88 P.3d
  5. 88 P.3d 271 (2004)
 

STATE v. VASQUEZ

(DC CF970282; CA A105506; SC S49148).

88 P.3d 271 (2004)

336 Or. 598

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Daniel Orozco VASQUEZ, aka David V. Orozco, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 15, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David John Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

James N. Varner, Oregon Appellate Consortium, Newberg, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, De MUNIZ, and BALMER, Justices.

GILLETTE, J.

In this criminal case, the issue is whether an 11-year delay between the filing of a "complainant's information" against defendant for murder and defendant's trial on that offense violated defendant's right to a trial "without delay" under Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution or to a "speedy trial" under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court denied defendant's motion to dismiss the case on those grounds. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases