Defendant landlord argues that she took reasonable measures to close her building and that plaintiff was merely a squatter at the building whose injury by reason of the building's concededly hazardous condition was not foreseeable and, accordingly, was not an eventuality for which she may be held accountable. However, the evidence adduced on the motion raises triable issues as to whether defendant did in fact close her building, or at least take reasonable measures to do...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
