1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 82 Conn.
  5. 82 Conn. App. 272 (2004)
 

PUCHALSKI v. MATHURA

(AC 23757)

82 Conn. App. 272 (2004)

MIROSLAW PUCHALSKI v. MAGNUS A. MATHURA ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Connecticut.

Officially released March 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juri E. Taalman, with whom, on the brief, was Timothy Brignole, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Jack G. Steigelfest, with whom, on the brief, was Constance L. Epstein, for the appellees (defendants).

Foti, Flynn and DiPentima, Js.

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The plaintiff, Miroslaw Puchalski, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Magnus A. Mathura and Kamini D. Headley, rendered after a jury trial in this personal injury action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) refused to admit into evidence as a full exhibit a police diagram contained in a police accident report and (2) refused to admit the diagram of the accident scene...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases