1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 343 (2004)
 

HARRIS v. WESTLY

No. B160741.

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 343 (2004)

116 Cal.App.4th 214

Gene HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Steve WESTLY, as Controller, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

As Modified March 3, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of William W. Palmer and William W. Palmer; Magana, Cathcart & McCarthy, Peter T. Cathcart and Clay Robbins, III, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, Robin B. Johansen, San Francisco, and James C. Harrison, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent.

BOLAND, J.

SUMMARY

The notice provisions of the Unclaimed Property Law do not require the Controller to provide notice to apparent owners of escheated stock before the Controller sells the stock. Sale of escheated stock without notice to the owners does not violate the due process provisions of the federal or state constitutions.

FACTUAL, PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND

Gene Harris, Peggy Lee Dominguez, Annette Schoon, Russ Garcia and Julianne...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases