Defendant did not preserve his argument that the court should not have imposed sentence without having received a report of the psychiatric, psychological and intelligence testing it had ordered in aid of sentencing, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant was not prejudiced because he received the minimum lawful sentence and because nothing in the record casts any doubt on his mental competence. Defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
