Substantial evidence supports respondent's findings that petitioner, while off duty, was present at a place known to be a brothel, that three days later, while on duty, petitioner solicited sex from prostitutes at that brothel in exchange for a promise of protection against arrest, and that in his official interview, petitioner falsely stated that his off-duty visit to the brothel was in an attempt to sign up a confidential informant. No basis exists to disturb the Hearing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
