DUMAS v. FIORITO


13 A.D.3d 332 (2004)

786 N.Y.S.2d 106

JACK DUMAS et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM FIORITO, Defendant, and GAYLE METZ, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 6, 2004.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Gayle Metz for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her. The cause of action to recover damages for fraud was not pleaded with the specificity required under CPLR 3016 (b) (see Scomello v Caronia, 232 A.D.2d 625 [1996]; 125 Assoc. v Cralin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases