1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 305 F.Supp.2d
  5. 305 F.Supp.2d 36 (2004)
 

SHULMAN v. VOYOU, LLC

No. CIV.A.02-1295(RMU).

305 F.Supp.2d 36 (2004)

John D. SHULMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. VOYOU, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 19, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Lichtenstein, I, Swidler, Berlin, Shereff & Friedman, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Bernard E. Goodman, Gary & Goodman PLLC, Vienna, VA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

GRANTING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

This contract case addresses the basic principle of always ensuring that jurisdiction exists. Before the court is the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The complaint invokes this court's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), the diversity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases