Each of the courts that ruled on the issue properly exercised its discretion in denying defense counsel's request for an examination of defendant pursuant to CPL article 730. Both courts properly relied on their own extensive observations of, and interactions with, defendant at various proceedings, at which defendant exhibited an understanding of the proceedings and an ability to assist in his defense (see People v Russell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FRANKLIN
7 A.D.3d 333 (2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 847
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM FRANKLIN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 11, 2004.
May 11, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
