Although the general rule is that an action may not be commenced against a New York municipality unless the plaintiff has complied with the municipality's timely demand for a General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing, we have held that where such hearing has been indefinitely postponed and defendant never served a subsequent demand, a motion to dismiss based upon a plaintiff's failure to appear for the hearing may be denied (Ruiz v New York City Hous. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BELTON v. LIBERTY LINES TRANSIT, INC.
3 A.D.3d 334 (2004)
769 N.Y.S.2d 885
CHANDRA BELTON et al., Appellants, v. LIBERTY LINES TRANSIT, INC., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 8, 2004.
January 8, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
