The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to preclude, as a sanction for an alleged late disclosure, certain photographs of defendant taken during his arrest processing. The pictures depicted him as wearing a distinctive jacket that became relevant to the case when defendant testified that at the time of his arrest he was wearing attire different from that depicted in the photograph. There was no indication of bad faith, and there was no genuine surprise because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
