There was clear and convincing evidence to support the finding that respondent father permanently neglected the child by failing to plan for his future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). The caseworker repeated to respondent that he must complete a drug rehabilitation program, a parenting skills program, visit consistently, and participate in regular random drug testing before he could gain custody of his son. However, respondent did not, within the statutorily...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
