It is well settled that the duty of an insurance broker runs to its customer and not to any additional insureds since there is no privity of contract for the imposition of liability (see Federal Ins. Co. v Spectrum Ins. Brokerage Servs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ARREDONDO v. CITY OF NEW YORK
6 A.D.3d 328 (2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 150
WILMAR ARRENDONDO et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants. ALPS MECHANICAL, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents-Appellants, and ADORNO-DENKER ASSOCIATES, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent. (And a Second Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 27, 2004.
April 27, 2004.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.