Defendant's claim that the court improperly denied his challenge for cause to a prospective juror is foreclosed because he did not exhaust all of his peremptory challenges (CPL 270.20 [2]). Although defendant was mistakenly offered a total of 21 peremptory challenges when he was only entitled to 15 such challenges under CPL 270.25 (2) (b), he declined to exercise the last challenge offered and, therefore, failed to exhaust all of his challenges (People v Lynch,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RAMOS
13 A.D.3d 321 (2004)
787 N.Y.S.2d 34
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL RAMOS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 28, 2004.
December 28, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
