1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 21 (2004)
 

LISKA v. ARNS LAW FIRM

No. A102926.

12 Cal.Rptr.3d 21 (2004)

117 Cal.App.4th 275

George LISKA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The ARNS LAW FIRM et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

March 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan Petro, for plaintiff and appellant.

Robert S. Arns and Morgan C. Smith, San Francisco, for defendants and respondents.

POLLAK, J.

May a client who loses a binding fee arbitration conducted pursuant to the mandatory fee arbitration statute (MFA), Business and Professions Code section 6200 et seq.,1 file a subsequent action against the attorney predicated on the same allegations of misconduct or breach of contract that formed the basis of the fee dispute? We hold that the client may do so, but that the client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases