1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 96 P.3d
  5. 96 P.3d 231 (2004)
 

MACKEY v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUCSON

No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0050.

96 P.3d 231 (2004)

208 Ariz. 527

Paul and Maureen MACKEY, husband and wife; Betty Gail Schuessler, a single person; and Bruce Bayly, an unmarried man, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUCSON, governing body of the City of Tucson, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

August 25, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. O'Dowd, Tucson, Anthony Ching, Tempe, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Michael Rankin, Tucson City Attorney, By Tobin Rosen, Tucson, for Defendants/Appellees.

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Paul and Maureen Mackey, Betty Gail Schuessler, and Bruce Bayly (collectively, the Mackeys) appeal from the trial court's judgment denying special action relief on their complaint, in which they had sought to void appellee City of Tucson's transfer of title to a portion of a street and to enforce certain notice requirements for the sale of public roadways. Finding that the City exchanged the roadway...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases