1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 3 A.D.3d
  5. 3 A.D.3d 320 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. ALVARADO

3 A.D.3d 320 (2004)

769 N.Y.S.2d 881

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE ALVARADO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 6, 2004.

Defendant's claim that his right of confrontation was violated when the undercover officer identified himself only by his shield number during his testimony is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Contrary to defendant's argument, a Confrontation Clause argument requires a specific contemporaneous objection (see e.g. People v Kello, 96 N.Y.2d 740, 743-744 [2001]; People v Maher,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases