Billy J. Randle, Jr., appeals his conviction of robbery, claiming insufficient evidence and improper jury instructions. When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether after review of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, an appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
