1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 296 (2004)
 

COHEN v. MAZOH

12 A.D.3d 296 (2004)

784 N.Y.S.2d 857

JOSEPH M. COHEN, Appellant, v. STEPHEN MAZOH et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 23, 2004.

The reinstated claims were adequately set forth with requisite particularity as to the painting's authenticity (see Bernstein v Kelso & Co., 231 A.D.2d 314, 320 [1997]). Allegations relating to the painting's provenance, on the other hand, were not adequately supported by the facts. Furthermore, the facts alleged do not establish gross, wanton or willful fraud or other morally culpable conduct to a degree sufficiently warranting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases