1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 282 (2004)
 

BILES v. EXXON MOBIL CORP.

No. A105783.

22 Cal.Rptr.3d 282 (2004)

124 Cal.App.4th 1315

Ronald BILES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

December 14, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brayton Purcell and Alan R. Brayton, Gilbert L. Purcell, Lloyd F. LeRoy and David Polin, Novato, for Appellant.

Armstrong & Associates and William H. Armstrong, Oakland, for Respondent.

RUVOLO, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

In deciding this appeal we deconstruct a civil discovery "urban legend"1 — that a responding party has an affirmative duty to supplement responses to interrogatories if and when new information comes into that party's possession, particularly if the party reserved the right to amend or supplement the earlier responses. Here a defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases