GLASSMAN v. McNAB

No. B157578

6 Cal.Rptr.3d 293 (2004)

112 Cal.App.4th 1593

Paul R. GLASSMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Cecil McNAB et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four

Rehearing Denied November 25, 2003

Review Denied February 18, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Girma H. Gerbriel and Girma H. Gebriel, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

Marshall & Perrigue and Grover A. Perrigue, Pasadena, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


CURRY, J.

When respondent Paul R. Glassman, an attorney, requested payment for his services from appellants Cecil McNab and Scirocco Partners, appellants sought arbitration of Glassman's claim pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6200 et seq. The arbitrators subsequently issued an award in Glassman's favor, and the trial court confirmed the award. Appellants contend that the trial court erred, arguing that the arbitrators exceeded their jurisdiction under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases