The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. In addition to defendant's recent, exclusive and unexplained possession of the proceeds of a burglary (see People v Galbo, 218 N.Y. 283, 290 [1916]), there was testimony that defendant matched the description of a man who left the burglarized building and headed toward the nearby location where, only a few minutes later, the police stopped...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
