1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 12 A.D.3d
  5. 12 A.D.3d 279 (2004)
 

SERRADILLA v. LORDS CORPORATION

12 A.D.3d 279 (2004)

785 N.Y.S.2d 433

LISA A. SERRADILLA et al., Plaintiffs, v. LORDS CORPORATION et al., Defendants. LISA A. SERRADILLA et al., Respondents, v. NATHAN BAROTZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 23, 2004.

The subject order is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]), and the record is devoid of any subsequent motion to vacate that would have properly placed the issues appellant now seeks to raise before this Court (see Sholes v Meagher, 100 N.Y.2d 333, 335-336 [2003]). However, in the interest of judicial economy (see Egwuonwu v Simpson, 4 A.D.3d 500<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases