The trial court properly concluded that the apartment is exempt from equitable distribution because it was acquired prior to the parties' marriage (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c], [d] [1]; [5] [b]). However, contrary to the court's conclusion, defendant is not entitled to reimbursement for the entire purchase price of the apartment upon the eventual sale of the unit, since the documentary and testimonial evidence
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BLENK v. BLENK
6 A.D.3d 283 (2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 294
DEBORAH R. BLENK, Appellant-Respondent, v. ANTHONY BLENK, Respondent-Appellant. DEBORAH R. BLENK, Appellant, v. ANTHONY BLENK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 22, 2004.
April 22, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
